-
Photo courtesy of Senate of the Philippines
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has denied the appeal filed by former president Rodrigo Duterte seeking to overturn an earlier ruling that declared him fit to participate in pre-trial proceedings.
In a decision dated Feb. 13, ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I dismissed the arguments raised by Duterte’s legal team, saying the issues presented did not warrant appellate review.
“An appealable ‘issue’ is an identifiable subject or topic requiring a decision for its resolution, not merely a question over which there is disagreement or conflicting opinion … [I]t must emanate from the relevant decision itself and cannot represent a hypothetical concern or abstract legal question,” the chamber said.
The ruling follows the court’s Jan. 26 determination that Duterte, who turns 81 in March, is fit to take part in the pre-trial process. The chamber had earlier rejected the defense’s request for an indefinite adjournment of the proceedings. Duterte’s camp filed its appeal on Feb. 2, citing four alleged errors.
Among the claims, the defense argued that the chamber “erred in fact and in law by ignoring relevant clinical evidence on Duterte’s lack of fitness to stand trial.”
It also contended that the chamber “erred in law by rejecting the Defense request to hold a hearing on Duterte’s purported fitness,” and “erred in law by failing to articulate coherently its reasoning” regarding its conclusion that Duterte is fit to proceed to the confirmation hearing.
The defense further maintained that the chamber “erred in law in confining its assessment” of Duterte’s fitness to the pre-trial phase and failed to consider the broader implications for his ability to stand trial.
In rejecting these claims, the Pre-Trial Chamber I said the defense had mischaracterized its earlier findings. It noted that the medical reports submitted by Duterte’s camp had been reviewed by a panel of independent experts, who factored them into their overall assessment.
The chamber added that the defense “failed to substantiate that there is any strident conflict or significant inconsistency which is capable of undermining the overall weight of the general joint conclusion on fitness.”
Addressing the argument that it had not clearly explained its reasoning, the chamber said it chose “to consider solely” the panel’s conclusions, which already incorporated the defense’s medical evidence, “to ensure the fairness of the proceedings.”
“[T]he Chamber gave clear and exhaustive instructions to the Experts as to the factual assessment they were required to carry out in order for the Chamber to proceed to its legal determination on Mr. Duterte’s fitness to participate in the proceedings,” it said.
“These instructions also reflect the elements, including the relevant rights of the suspect, on which the Panel had to focus to provide its conclusions. The Panel’s Reports specifically addressed these points, and the Chamber made findings based on the Panel’s conclusions,” it added.
The chamber clarified that its Jan. 26 decision “does not prejudge” Duterte’s fitness for trial and does not prevent the issue from being revisited if circumstances change.
“Accordingly, the Chamber is of the view that the Fourth Proposed Issue is not able to significantly affect the fairness of the proceedings,” it said.
Duterte is currently detained at the ICC Detention Center in The Hague, the Netherlands. The court is set to hold a confirmation hearing on Feb. 23 to determine whether sufficient evidence exists to establish grounds to believe that he committed crimes against humanity in connection with the anti-drug campaign carried out during his time as Davao City mayor and later as president.
Separately, the Pre-Trial Chamber I authorized the participation of 500 individuals in the pre-trial proceedings, classifying them as Group A or persons “who clearly qualify as victims.”
The ICC has adopted a system for evaluating victim applications, categorizing them into Group A for applicants who clearly qualify as victims, Group B for those who clearly do not qualify, and Group C for applicants whose status cannot yet be determined.